Well-being Content Inclusion in Pharmacy Education Across the United States and Canada

Objective. To describe the landscape of well-being content inclusion across schools and colleges of pharmacy in the United States and Canada through identification of content implementation, incorporation, and assessment. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to all accredited schools and colleges of pharmacy in the United States (n=143) and Canada (n=10). Survey questions included curricular and cocurricular timing, frequency, assessment strategies, and support for well-being initiatives, using a framework of eight dimensions (pillars) of wellness to categorize content. Results. Descriptive data analyses were applied to 99 completed surveys (65%), 89 (62%) in the United States and 10 (100%) in Canada. Well-being content was most prevalent within the cocurricular realm and incorporated into didactic and elective more than experiential curricula. The most content came from intellectual, emotional, and physical pillars, and the least content came from financial, spiritual, and environmental pillars. Less than 50% of schools and colleges of pharmacy include well-being within their strategic plans or core values. Funding is primarily at the level of the university (59%) or the school or college of pharmacy (59%). Almost half of respondents reported inclusion of some assessment, with a need for more training, expertise, and standardization. Conclusion. Survey results revealed a wide range of implementation and assessment of well-being programs across the United States and Canada. These results provide a reference point for the state of well-being programs that can serve as a call to action and research across the Academy.

Impact of asynchronous virtual learning on student well-being and success.

INTRODUCTION: As the world has rapidly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students' overall well-being has been prioritized. This study aimed to evaluate PharmD students' well-being and perceived academic engagement when moved involuntarily to a majority asynchronous and virtual curriculum during the 2020-2021 academic year in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, this study aimed to assess demographic predictors relating student well-being and academic engagement. METHODS: A survey administered via Qualtrics (SAP) was sent to three cohorts of professional students (Classes of 2022 to 2024) enrolled in the PharmD program at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy. These cohorts were engaged in a primarily asynchronous and virtual curriculum due to COVID-19. RESULTS: Although students displayed mixed results on how asynchronous learning affected their well-being, students replied that they would want to continue learning via a hybrid model (53.3%) or completely asynchronous (24%), while 17.3% wanted primarily synchronous and 5.3% did not reply. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that aspects of the majority asynchronous and virtual learning environment were favored by students. Through student responses, our faculty and staff can take into consideration students' opinions when making future changes to the curriculum. We provided this data for others to consider when evaluating well-being and engagement with a virtual and asynchronous curriculum.